Did Jesus Really Whip People or Tell His Disciples to Carry Swords? A Deep Dive Into Two Misunderstood Passages
- Hilda Castillo-Landrum

- Jan 4
- 4 min read
Updated: Jan 13

I was recently having a conversation with my husband and two of his young friends. We were talking about the scripture, “Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth.”
— Matthew 5:5
We were discussing how the word “meek” is often misunderstood today. Many people hear it and assume it means “weak,” “soft,” or “easily pushed around,” but that is not what Jesus meant. In the original language, meekness refers to power under control; like a trained war horse: strong, disciplined, responsive to its rider. As someone who lives on a farm and has always loved horses, that connection absolutely resonated with me. I also have a full blog post dedicated to the meaning of “meek,” I’ll link that —> HERE.
In the middle of that conversation, one of my husband’s young friends suddenly said, “Well, Jesus made a whip and whipped people.” I was honestly shocked to hear him say that. I had never understood that passage that way. I had always known the whip was used to drive out the animals, not people and that claim also didn’t line up with Christ’s character.
Then he added, “Jesus also told His disciples to carry swords for protection.”
Again, that didn’t sit well with me. I did gently challenge him on it, but he was confiden, and for a moment I wondered if maybe there was something I had missed in Scripture. So instead of just brushing it off, I decided to deep-dive the passages myself. Not to prove him wrong, but because the conversation left me wondering:
What if there was more I needed to understand?
What if I had overlooked something?
So here we are…and after digging into every relevant verse, here’s what Scripture actually says…
1. Did Jesus Make a Whip and Use It on People?
This comes from the event known as the cleansing of the Temple, recorded in all four Gospels.
The most detailed account is John 2:13–17
“So He made a whip of cords, and drove them all out of the temple courts, with the sheep and oxen. And He poured out the coins of the money changers and overturned their tables.” (v. 15)
There’s a lot of nuance here that gets lost in casual retellings.
Yes, Jesus made a whip. That part is true.
No, the Bible never says He whipped people with it. The Greek makes it clear the whip was used to drive out animals (“sheep and oxen”).
It does not describe Him striking human beings.
The other Gospels describe the cleansing, but none mention a whip.
Matthew, Mark, and Luke only describe:
overturning tables
rebuking corruption
quoting Scripture
His actions were righteous, controlled, and prophetic. Not violent aggression.
Jesus explains His reason:
“My Father’s house shall be a house of prayer.”
He confronted exploitation in the Temple. He did not attack people. So the claim “Jesus whipped people” simply isn’t biblical.
2. Did Jesus Tell His Disciples to Carry Swords for Protection?
This comes from Luke 22:36–38, where Jesus says: “If you don’t have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one.”
At first glance, some assume this means Jesus wanted them armed for self-defense.
But that interpretation collapses when you read the passage in context.
A. Only TWO swords were present and Jesus said that was enough. The disciples said, “Look, Lord, here are two swords.”
And Jesus replied, “It is enough.”
If He meant for protection:
there are 12 grown men
two swords would never be “enough”
But two swords are enough to fulfill something else…
B. Jesus was fulfilling prophecy, not forming a militia. Just one verse later, He quotes Isaiah 53:12:
“He was numbered with the transgressors.”
Criminals carried weapons. Jesus was about to be arrested like a criminal. This moment symbolically fulfills the prophecy.
C. When Peter actually uses a sword, Jesus IMMEDIATELY forbids it. This is important.
Peter takes one of the swords and strikes the servant of the high priest.
Jesus’s response?
“Put your sword back in its place.” (Matthew 26:52)
“No more of this!” (Luke 22:51)
And He heals the man’s ear.
If the swords were truly for protection after Jesus left, this is the exact moment Jesus would have approved their use. Instead, He shuts it down instantly.
D. Jesus’ entire ministry rejected violence.
He taught:
turn the other cheek
love your enemies
bless those who persecute you
peacemakers are blessed
overcome evil with good
Even during His arrest, He said:
“My kingdom is not of this world. If it were, my servants would fight.” — John 18:36
E. The early church never carried weapons.
After Jesus ascended:
the apostles were beaten
jailed
tortured
executed
None used force, none fought back and None carried swords for protection. If Jesus’ command was literal, the early church failed miserably at obeying Him, and that makes no sense.
F. Scholars overwhelmingly agree: the “sword” was symbolic.
It matched:
prophecy
the shift toward persecution
their new journey without Jesus physically present
Not violence, but readiness, seriousness, and prophetic fulfillment.
After digging into every relevant passage, this is what Scripture actually shows:
Jesus did make a whip, but He didn’t whip people. He drove out animals and cleansed the Temple of corruption.
Jesus did mention swords, but NOT for protection. Only two swords existed, and Jesus rebuked their usage. He was fulfilling prophecy, not encouraging violence.
The disciples never used force with Jesus’ approval. Every attempt at violence was corrected, undone, or rebuked.
Jesus’ kingdom advances through truth, sacrifice, humility, and love. Never the sword.
The more I studied, the more everything aligned with the Jesus I know from Scripture:
meek, righteous, powerful, controlled, holy, and entirely consistent. And to me, that is far more beautiful than the misconceptions people sometimes repeat.




Comments